Will the CCP pick the next US President by fake mail-in ballots?


The ruling on extending the deadline for mail-in ballots is becoming another flashpoint in this General Election. This opens up the possibility of ballot fraud. The Chinese Communist Party, CCP, has pinned its dream of taking over the world on Biden’s victory. The CCP’s strategy to achieve this outcome not only includes BGY but also election fraud

The White House National Security Adviser O’Brien said on Aug. 9 that hackers associated with the CCP had been attacking the U.S. election infrastructure and websites. The hackers attempted to infiltrate the websites of the offices of the Secretary of State, which administer local elections across the United States, in order to collect data on Americans. Besides, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reported that in the first half of this year, nearly 20,000 fake U.S. driver’s licenses originated from China and Hong Kong were found in Chicago Customs alone. These fake driver’s licenses are the CCP’s attempt to create false votes and steal the election.

The CCP’s strategy of election fraud

Mr. LuDe, the host of LuDe Media of the Whistleblower Movement, pointed out that the CCP had already collected a lot of personal information through WeChat, TikTok, and through hacking. Extending the mail-in ballots’ deadline allows the CCP to see the results on election day so that they could navigate the fraudulent votes to districts where Biden is losing, all in an effort to disrupt the Trump victory. All three states, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, can be flipped by making no more than 200,000 fraudulent votes if we have a similar turnout as in 2016.

In the 2016 election, Trump won by about 20,000 votes in Florida. Based on the big data the CCP has, they can guess who are the unlikely voters. With the voters’ IDs in their possession, the CCP can vote on their behalf without their knowledge. With 30,000 more fake ballots, Trump could easily lose Florida given the same turnout as the last election. In Pennsylvania, it only takes 10,000 fraudulent votes.

Election fraud was evident in Florida’s 2018 midterm elections. In the last minutes of counting, there were still boxes of uncounted ballots at the various counting locations, all voting Democrat. When the governor pressed on the legitimacy of these votes, Democratic election officials retreated immediately.

Four days before this year’s General Election, eighty-six million people have voted. But a batch of mail-in ballots in a Pennsylvania county have not reached the voters. The Butler County Elections Department sent out 40,000 ballots by mail at the request of voters.  About half of these ballots have been received, but at the same time, the authorities have received tens of thousands of calls asking where the ballot papers have gone, saying that they have not yet received them. The missing ballots should have been mailed by mid-October, the elections department said, but a preliminary check by the Postal Service concluded that the ballots never made it to the post office.

On Aug. 14, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) asked the state’s Supreme Court to extend the deadline for mail-in ballots to be counted after the U.S. Postal Service warned that some ballots might not make the Election Day deadline. The court granted this request. The federal Supreme Court upheld the ruling on Oct. 19, allowing votes received within three days of the Election Day to be counted. Wisconsin and North Carolina wanted to change the rules on the mail-in ballots as well.

As Election Day approaches, ballot fraud is already surfacing in different states. This gives the CCP more opportunity to create fraudulent ballots. Considering that Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes and Trump won the state by less than one percentage point in 2016, Pennsylvania Republicans returned to the Supreme Court on the 23rd, asking the justices “as soon as practicable” to rule on the substance of the dispute, while asking the Supreme Court “to intervene in a timely manner,” to provide much-needed clarity and prohibit local courts from continually changing election rules in advance of an election.

Source: americanmilitarynews.com

However, on Oc. 29, the Supreme Court again refused to change Pennsylvania’s election rules, thus defeated state Republican’s efforts to reimpose an Election Day deadline for the return of absentee ballots. As a result, ballots received by Nov. 6 would then be counted as valid. However, ballots received after the polls close on No. 6 will be segregated from those received earlier. If those ballots affect the state’s outcome, the high court may consider the state Republican’s request after the election. It seems the situation is dire and not to be underestimated.

The result of Amy Corny Barrett’s inauguration

Amy Coney Barrett was sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice outside the White House on Oct. 26. On the same day, the Supreme Court made an important ruling on the Election Day vote count. The high court voted 5-3 to deny an extension of the deadline for mail-in ballots in swing-state Wisconsin. All ballots had to be received no later than 8 p.m. on Nov. 3 before they would be counted. But Justice Barrett did not participate in either decision “because of the need for a prompt resolution” and because she had not had time to fully review the parties’ documents.

Barrett’s confirmation increased the conservatives’ proportion on the Supreme Court, bringing the number of conservative justices to six. Despite the Chief Justice’s increasing wavering attitude, the ruling outcomes will not be seriously affected. Thus, if the election results were ever in question, it would undoubtedly go to the Supreme Court through judicial litigation. A nine-member vote would have made this U.S. election fair the outcome and would have given an essential guarantee that the U.S. Constitution would be upheld.

On the other hand, separating the ballots received before and after the polls close can effectively prevent fraud. If most of the votes received are for Democrats, it would be blatant cheating. It is believed that at that time, the Supreme Court will make a fair ruling and crush the CCP’s goal of reversing the election results and subverting the American democratic system in one fell swoop.

Author: DC Coach
Source: G-news


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here