一个由前辉瑞副总裁 Dr. 迈克尔·耶登等组成的英国团体已代表英国公民向国际刑事法院提起诉讼，控告鲍里斯·约翰逊和英国官员、比尔和梅琳达·盖茨、大型制药公司的负责人、世界经济论坛主席克劳斯·施瓦布等人危害人类罪。
此外，起诉书提到安东尼·福奇、世界卫生组织（WHO）总干事谭德塞、美国药品和保健品监管局（MHRA）负责人琼·雷恩（June Raine），洛克菲勒基金会主席拉迪夫·沙阿 (Radiv Shah) 和生态健康联盟主席彼得·达扎克 (Peter Daszak) 要为对英国和其他国家多次违反纽伦堡法典、战争罪和侵略罪负责。
在 12 月 6 日的诉讼中，该组织提供了证据表明 COVID-19“疫苗”是利用蝙蝠冠状病毒的研究开发的实验性基因疗法，导致了大量死亡和副作用。并且PCR 检测完全不可靠，含有致癌的环氧乙烷。
他们认为 疫苗接种是灾难。羟氯喹和伊维菌素等对COVID-19 的有效治疗被打压，学术期刊禁止刊登伊维菌素和羟氯喹等药物有效性的研究，导致 COVID-19 的死亡人数高于应有的水平，等同于谋杀。 政府人为夸大人造病毒的感染率和死亡率借此封锁，严重剥夺人身自由，违反国际法基本规则。
事实证明，政府和媒体就 COVID 大流行向公众撒谎。
香草山金融部 – AT翻译
Covid-19: Pharmaceutical giants, Gates, Fauci, UK officials accused of crimes against humanity in International Criminal Court complaint
RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – U.K. officials and the world’s most powerful health figures are accused of genocide, citing a series of statistics on the effects of “vaccines” and policies imposed under the guise of ‘mitigating COVID’.
A group including former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on behalf of U.K. citizens against Boris Johnson and U.K. officials, Bill and Melinda Gates, CEOs of major pharmaceutical companies, World Economic Forum executive chairman Klaus Schwab, and others for crimes against humanity.
The U.K. group, an astrophysicist, and a funeral director were indicted.
- Dr. Anthony Fauci;
- Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO);
- June Raine, executive director of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA);
- Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and
- Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, as “responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code … war crimes and crimes of aggression” in the United Kingdom and other countries.
After repeated unsuccessful attempts to bring a case before the English court system, the plaintiffs resorted to asking with “the utmost urgency” that the ICC “stop the deployment of COVID vaccines, the introduction of illegal vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare … being waged against the people of the United Kingdom.”
The group’s complaint filed Dec. 6 presents evidence that COVID-19 “vaccines” are experimental gene therapies designed with bat coronavirus gain-of-function research, arguing that these “vaccines” have caused massive deaths and injuries and that the U.K. government has failed to investigate such reported fatalities and injuries.
- that the numbers of COVID cases and deaths have been artificially inflated; that the masks are harmful from hypoxia, hypercapnia, and other causes;
- and the PCR tests are “completely unreliable” and “contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide.”
In addition, they argued that effective treatments for COVID-19, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, were suppressed, resulting in a more significant number of COVID-19 deaths than should have occurred.
They argue that the blockades were enacted under the guise of artificially inflated infection and death numbers from a modified virus, as well as the experimental “vaccines” that have resulted:
- Massive short-term harm and death, with at least 395,049 reported adverse reactions to COVID “vaccines” in the U.K. alone;
- a sharp increase in ChildLine calls from vulnerable children during lockdowns;
- “Wealth and business destruction” through imposed lockdowns.”
- “Severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law,” including travel and assembly bans, and forced quarantine and self-isolation;
- apartheid due to segregation by possession or vaccination passport;
- and “expected reduction infertility” following “vaccination,” among other harmful physical and psychological effects.
In addition, the petitioners contend that “the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.”
They noted that in addition to censorship of online information and promotion of these alternative treatments, “some academic journals are blocking publication of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.”
The petitioners also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who have drawn “strong parallels between Covid’s restrictions and the beginning of the Holocaust.”
In an open letter, the Holocaust survivors have called on medical regulatory authorities to “stop this unholy medical experiment on humanity immediately,” which they contend violates the Nuremberg Code.
They even allege that “before our eyes, another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place.” One survivor, Vera Sharav, noted in an interview quoted in the complaint:
“The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever physicians join forces with the government and deviate from their personal, professional, and clinical commitment not to harm the individual, medicine can pervert from a healing and caring profession to a murderous apparatus.”
“What distinguishes the Holocaust from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. The academic and professional medical establishment supported every step of the murderous process.
Doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the veneer of legitimacy to infanticide, the mass murder of civilians.”
According to the petitioners, all the harmful consequences of the “vaccines,” the enclosures and the virus meet the criteria of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes against the people of the British, because the culprits “members of the U.K. government and world leaders have knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”
Indeed, they argue that the destructive consequences of “vaccines,” blockades, and modified viruses are deliberate attempts at depopulation and social destabilization as part of a globally coordinated plan to consolidate wealth and power in the hands of the few.
Therefore, they argue that these measures also constitute a “crime of aggression,” i.e., the effort “to effectively exercise control or direct the political or military action of a State.”
In this case, they claim, the aim is to “dismantle all Democratic Nation States, step by step”, and “destroy small and medium-sized enterprises, transferring market shares to the largest corporations”, owned by the ultra-rich, to give this “elite” group greater political and monetary control.